<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NY Commercial Litigation Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://barnespc.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://barnespc.com/blog</link>
	<description>Your Goals. Our Guidance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 14:27:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Converting a Fifth Amendment Invocation Into a Negative Inference</title>
		<link>http://barnespc.com/blog/2011/10/converting-a-fifth-amendment-invocation-into-a-negative-inference/</link>
		<comments>http://barnespc.com/blog/2011/10/converting-a-fifth-amendment-invocation-into-a-negative-inference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 14:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PRMG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Suffolk Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long island commercial attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long island commercial lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york commercial attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york commercial lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barnespc.com/blog/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="center">By Leo K. Barnes Jr.*
*Mr. Barnes, a member of Barnes &#38; Barnes, P.C., can be reached at lkb@barnespc.com</p>
<p align="justify">Last month we addressed the  transformation of a criminal court plea or guilty verdict into civil  court liability, relying upon collateral estoppel.  This month we take a  step back.  Assume that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://barnespc.com/blog/2011/10/converting-a-fifth-amendment-invocation-into-a-negative-inference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maximizing Criminal Court Results, in the Civil Arena, Through Collateral Estoppel</title>
		<link>http://barnespc.com/blog/2011/09/maximizing-criminal-court-results-in-the-civil-arena-through-collateral-estoppel/</link>
		<comments>http://barnespc.com/blog/2011/09/maximizing-criminal-court-results-in-the-civil-arena-through-collateral-estoppel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 15:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Suffolk Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long island commercial attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long island commercial lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york commercial attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york commercial lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nycommerciallitigationblog.com/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="center">By Leo K. Barnes Jr.*
*Mr. Barnes, a member of Barnes &#38; Barnes, P.C., can be reached at lkb@barnespc.com</p>
<p align="justify">Introduction</p>
<p align="justify">For civil counsel engaged to right criminal wrongs  committed by a Corporation’s former officer or employee, the frustration  of the delays incident to a parallel criminal proceeding can  nonetheless ultimately bear fruit [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://barnespc.com/blog/2011/09/maximizing-criminal-court-results-in-the-civil-arena-through-collateral-estoppel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Money Isn’t Everything – Undermining An Injunction Application by Quantifying Damages</title>
		<link>http://barnespc.com/blog/2011/04/money-isn%e2%80%99t-everything-%e2%80%93-undermining-an-injunction-application-by-quantifying-damages/</link>
		<comments>http://barnespc.com/blog/2011/04/money-isn%e2%80%99t-everything-%e2%80%93-undermining-an-injunction-application-by-quantifying-damages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Suffolk Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of contract attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long island commercial attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long island commercial lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york commercial attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york commercial lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nycommerciallitigationblog.com/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="center">By Leo K. Barnes Jr.*
*Mr. Barnes, a member of Barnes &#38; Barnes, P.C., can be reached at lkb@barnespc.com</p>
<p align="justify">The adage “money isn’t everything” has particular  significance for injunction applications.  A January 2011 decision by  Eastern District Judge Nicholas Garaufis reminds counsel that no matter  how solid a liability and damages [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://barnespc.com/blog/2011/04/money-isn%e2%80%99t-everything-%e2%80%93-undermining-an-injunction-application-by-quantifying-damages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leveling the Playing Field for Chronic Non-Compliance</title>
		<link>http://barnespc.com/blog/2011/03/leveling-the-playing-field-for-chronic-non-compliance/</link>
		<comments>http://barnespc.com/blog/2011/03/leveling-the-playing-field-for-chronic-non-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Suffolk Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of contract attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long island commercial attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long island commercial lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york commercial attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york commercial lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nycommerciallitigationblog.com/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="center">By: Leo K. Barnes Jr.</p>
<p align="justify">In a recent column, we addressed recent Appellate  Division authority concerning the ultimate sanction for failure to  disclose, a CPLR 3126 Order striking a pleading.   In December, the  Court of Appeals issued Gibbs v. St. Barnabas Hospital, 2010 N.Y. Slip.  Op. 09198 (2010) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://barnespc.com/blog/2011/03/leveling-the-playing-field-for-chronic-non-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divided Loyalty: Damages for Employee Disloyalty Claims</title>
		<link>http://barnespc.com/blog/2011/02/divided-loyalty-damages-for-employee-disloyalty-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://barnespc.com/blog/2011/02/divided-loyalty-damages-for-employee-disloyalty-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New York Law Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of contract attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long island commercial attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long island commercial lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york commercial attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york commercial lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nycommerciallitigationblog.com/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="center">By: Leo K. Barnes Jr.</p>
<p align="justify">At first blush, two principles regarding the loyalty  due to a current employer from an employee seem irreconcilable: on the  one hand, an employee owes his employer complete loyalty; on the other,  an employee may incorporate a competitive business prior to departure  from employment as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://barnespc.com/blog/2011/02/divided-loyalty-damages-for-employee-disloyalty-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CPLR 3126(3) &#8212; The Ultimate Remedy for Willful Failure to Disclose</title>
		<link>http://barnespc.com/blog/2011/01/cplr-31263-the-ultimate-remedy-for-willful-failure-to-disclose/</link>
		<comments>http://barnespc.com/blog/2011/01/cplr-31263-the-ultimate-remedy-for-willful-failure-to-disclose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Suffolk Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law outline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long island commercial attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long island commercial lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york commercial attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york commercial lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nycommerciallitigationblog.com/?p=155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="center">By: Leo K. Barnes Jr.</p>
<p align="justify">In two opinions issued on the same day this spring,  the First and Second Departments continued a trend of affirming trial  court rulings striking pleadings pursuant to CPLR 3126 once a willful  failure to disclose is documented.  Although the result is severe, both  the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://barnespc.com/blog/2011/01/cplr-31263-the-ultimate-remedy-for-willful-failure-to-disclose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attachment Premised Upon Intent to Defraud</title>
		<link>http://barnespc.com/blog/2010/10/attachment-premised-upon-intent-to-defraud/</link>
		<comments>http://barnespc.com/blog/2010/10/attachment-premised-upon-intent-to-defraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Suffolk Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attachment premised upon intent to defraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nycommerciallitigationblog.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">By: Leo K. Barnes Jr.</p>
<p align="justify">This Column has previous addressed the basis for an Article 62 attachmenti in the context of a foreign confession of judgment pursuant to CPLR  6201(5).   In that scenario, by the time that New York counsel is  engaged, the hard work has already been done by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://barnespc.com/blog/2010/10/attachment-premised-upon-intent-to-defraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Substantiating Malice for Tortious Interference Claim Getting Difficult</title>
		<link>http://barnespc.com/blog/2010/08/substantiating-malice-for-tortious-interference-claim-getting-difficult/</link>
		<comments>http://barnespc.com/blog/2010/08/substantiating-malice-for-tortious-interference-claim-getting-difficult/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New York Law Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long island commercial attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long island commercial lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york commercial attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york commercial lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Substantiating Malice for Tortious Interference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nycommerciallitigationblog.com/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="center">By: Leo K. Barnes Jr.</p>
<p align="justify">Several weeks before then-President George W. Bush  defeated presidential candidate John Kerry, CBS News correspondent Dan  Rather narrated a &#8220;60 Minutes&#8221; piece assailing President Bush&#8217;s service  in the Texas Air National Guard. According to Mr. Rather, subsequent to  Mr. Bush&#8217;s re-election in November 2004, CBS [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://barnespc.com/blog/2010/08/substantiating-malice-for-tortious-interference-claim-getting-difficult/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Easy to Allege, Difficult to Substantiate: Piercing the Corporate Veil</title>
		<link>http://barnespc.com/blog/2010/07/easy-to-allege-difficult-to-substantiate-piercing-the-corporate-veil/</link>
		<comments>http://barnespc.com/blog/2010/07/easy-to-allege-difficult-to-substantiate-piercing-the-corporate-veil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Suffolk Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long island commercial attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long island commercial lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york commercial attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york commercial lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nycommerciallitigationblog.com/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="center">By: Leo K. Barnes Jr.*</p>
<p align="justify">With Plaintiffs seeking to maximize a source of  recovery and Defendants seeking to minimize the same, discovery in  commercial matters may focus upon the liability of an individual  shareholder for a claim asserted against a corporation.  Plaintiffs are  quick to name shareholders as defendants [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://barnespc.com/blog/2010/07/easy-to-allege-difficult-to-substantiate-piercing-the-corporate-veil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Death (or Dismissal) By Exhibits &amp; Admissions</title>
		<link>http://barnespc.com/blog/2010/03/death-or-dismissal-by-exhibits-admissions/</link>
		<comments>http://barnespc.com/blog/2010/03/death-or-dismissal-by-exhibits-admissions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Suffolk Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death (or Dismissal) By Exhibits & Admissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee wrongful termination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law termination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrongful termination attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrongful termination laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrongful termination lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nycommerciallitigationblog.com/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="center">By: Leo K. Barnes Jr.*</p>
<p align="justify">A recent mid-winter decision from Central Islip Eastern District Judge Sandra Feuerstein provides a stark reminder to counsel for Plaintiffs to scrutinize documentation annexed as exhibits to a Complaint as the same may later haunt the Plaintiff as a basis for dismissal.</p>
<p align="justify">In Levista Inc. v. Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Inc., [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://barnespc.com/blog/2010/03/death-or-dismissal-by-exhibits-admissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

